tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post3111796109819565555..comments2024-03-20T11:41:56.776-04:00Comments on Tank Archives: Soviet Very High Power Guns: BL-9Peterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comBlogger24125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-39108936090229116512021-12-15T15:42:16.607-05:002021-12-15T15:42:16.607-05:00Striking velocity for this shell at 1000m is 925m/...Striking velocity for this shell at 1000m is 925m/s.Peasanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00548023869907629898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-43299299433746000692020-12-02T23:50:43.204-05:002020-12-02T23:50:43.204-05:00thanks -- why not in a is2 or is3?thanks -- why not in a is2 or is3?neohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16769182614452171312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-3188531385900421092020-03-21T12:18:52.479-04:002020-03-21T12:18:52.479-04:00The penetration of the guns is compared in this ta...The penetration of the guns is compared in this table: http://www.tankarchives.ca/2013/03/penetration.html<br /><br />No tanks were ever actually equipped with this gun.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-85466508243285292812020-03-21T01:33:22.677-04:002020-03-21T01:33:22.677-04:00How did this BL 9 gun compare with the 100mm gun o...How did this BL 9 gun compare with the 100mm gun on the T55 and the D25 gun on the IS2?<br /><br />did any tanks actually have this gunneohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17318664916557810347noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-89756671822221334582018-09-25T17:53:19.618-04:002018-09-25T17:53:19.618-04:00It's ALL about World of Tanks!!!!! Fucking cri...It's ALL about World of Tanks!!!!! Fucking criked!<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02629789591128915296noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-15753704785188439912017-11-14T11:33:29.313-05:002017-11-14T11:33:29.313-05:00German tanks had good and bad points just like Rus...German tanks had good and bad points just like Russian tanks. Most of the German successes early in the can be attributed not to German technology but to German technique. Better C2 all around.Everybody thinks the Panther was a good tank. It had a great gun but if you tried to move it around you were screwed. Soviet tanks were much more reliable.Scrat335https://www.blogger.com/profile/13907443520581340172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-86533458656569930192016-06-11T14:43:08.288-04:002016-06-11T14:43:08.288-04:00Fucking cuckedFucking cuckedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-41046128532620766862016-03-25T13:25:41.109-04:002016-03-25T13:25:41.109-04:00German tanks like the Tiger and pnather had better...German tanks like the Tiger and pnather had better guns at first but in general the soviets outproduced and out competed the German ones. German tanks were gas-guzzling complexities with bad manuverability and cross-country ability. Only uperior organization in the early stages of the war gave them the advantage. Engineering, Science, Art and other interestshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04913093775920445623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-75521432434450753392016-03-18T17:21:14.590-04:002016-03-18T17:21:14.590-04:00airplanes cannot occupy & hold a land surface,...airplanes cannot occupy & hold a land surface, ships cant do either.Navy can disrupt supply lines and isolate with a blockage an island or even a country, but STILL you have to put troops on the ground to take back this piece of land.Even if you destroy a country's military manufacturing capacity ,still you ll have to eliminate every pocket of resistance/defense of enemy ground troops.nd you cant do that with naval guns or flying tin cans straffing the ground with cannons rockets and bombs.US army had to fight japanese troops in caves and charge with bayonettes long after the Japanese military capacity was almost completely destroyed.War was won on the Eastern Front and on Land,deal with it.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03099811760484460608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-40182426770407422462015-11-20T05:32:30.757-05:002015-11-20T05:32:30.757-05:00And don't forget that Germans used just about ...And don't forget that Germans used just about 12-13% of their AA-artillery in eastern front including Poland and Baltic states and that oil of Romania in early 1944 had only 13-15% share of German fuel production (for Luftwaffe even less). <br /><br />As you will notice there are lots of myths Russian Great Patriotic War Nonsense Factory is still feeding for ignorants. Perhaps the greatest shock will be when Russians finally realise how less big power actually put on land warfare. For instance Germans invested some 30% for land warfare, western allies some 20-25% and Japanese hardly more than 15%. Armies generally have always been much more backward than navies and air forces. Besides losses of army weapons and tanks were much easier and faster replaced than expensive navy vessels. It took much time and training to have skilful pilots too than some ordinary infantry men to those bulk divisions.<br /><br />So army losses were not decisive at all while lost battleships, aircraft carriers and well trained pilots were. Folks are too much focusing land battles. Erik Larssennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-27959581212426743972015-11-20T05:24:15.897-05:002015-11-20T05:24:15.897-05:00Perhaps the hardest test for any Russian patriot i...Perhaps the hardest test for any Russian patriot is to face the fact that it was RAF and USAAF + western allied navy forces which destroyed in 1943 some 25% of German war production. In 1944 they destroyed at least 50% plus 80% of German fuel production. So actually it was western allied who eliminated more than 35% of German war production before it started journey to battleground.<br /><br />In air war Lufwaffe losses were: 75% in west and south, 25% in eastern front. Putting those figures together we can be sure that for every 153 German aircraft aim to produce, 53 was eliminated by western allied air (and sea) power, 75 eliminated by western allied air power in combat zone (combat or operational losses) and only 25 eliminated by Soviet forces (either combat or operational losses). <br /><br />Soviet Union caused only about 16% of Luftwaffe total losses either in factory or combat level. So in reality when remembering how vital air power was - the war was won by western allied air and sea power, not by ragged hungry Soviet forces.Erik Larssennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-62873478457196723272015-11-07T19:58:37.286-05:002015-11-07T19:58:37.286-05:00Not everything is about world of tanks you stupid ...Not everything is about world of tanks you stupid cockAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16455188183144882371noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-53085004827109668822015-08-23T13:53:29.584-04:002015-08-23T13:53:29.584-04:00Possibly, it it would likely end up only in tank d...Possibly, it it would likely end up only in tank destroyers, not in heavy tanks.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-45970928045314683902015-08-23T03:41:09.367-04:002015-08-23T03:41:09.367-04:00Sorry, I meant OBM-51Sorry, I meant OBM-51Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-88635010449367986432015-08-23T03:36:40.474-04:002015-08-23T03:36:40.474-04:00I wonder, if the Germans had deployed the maus, wo...I wonder, if the Germans had deployed the maus, would the IS version of the bl-9 have been used on the IS-2 or IS-3?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-87348950450158849462015-06-23T00:33:32.272-04:002015-06-23T00:33:32.272-04:00soviet power gun is amazing, it is powerful and it...soviet power gun is amazing, it is powerful and it is good for shooting and self defence.himanshuhttp://huntingset.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-65469451679697881262015-02-22T14:21:19.040-05:002015-02-22T14:21:19.040-05:00I read some of this blog (I think that's what ...I read some of this blog (I think that's what you should call this impressive chunk of historical records)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-66972891100859656102015-02-22T14:07:31.743-05:002015-02-22T14:07:31.743-05:00I don't see how you could come to that conclus...I don't see how you could come to that conclusion by reading this article.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-81191405855103774462015-02-22T11:58:11.018-05:002015-02-22T11:58:11.018-05:00so am I to understand that Germans tanks are total...so am I to understand that Germans tanks are total garbage while russian tanks > German tanks? please, do clarifyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-9598178386077356582013-06-19T08:29:35.603-04:002013-06-19T08:29:35.603-04:00That's why the KV version only reaches 950 met...That's why the KV version only reaches 950 meters per second.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-48453451214285038952013-06-19T07:29:55.423-04:002013-06-19T07:29:55.423-04:00Excellent read, but one question come to mind:
Wou...Excellent read, but one question come to mind:<br />Would the KV chassis could even handle this massive turret and gun with it's recoil?blackluposhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08574300842982087326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-68350857310149889512013-06-19T04:17:41.080-04:002013-06-19T04:17:41.080-04:00"BL-9 against a 203 mm plate at 1000 meters&q..."BL-9 against a 203 mm plate at 1000 meters" and penetration ? 0_o<br />Yes, please, I'll take one! :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-64997136998197255302013-06-18T15:46:55.816-04:002013-06-18T15:46:55.816-04:00Could make for a decent tier 7 premium heavy.
good...Could make for a decent tier 7 premium heavy.<br />good gun, but terrible manoeuvrability and worse armour.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-90544274855093934792013-06-14T13:05:49.405-04:002013-06-14T13:05:49.405-04:00KV-1S with BL-9 (equivalent)?
Yes, please, I'l...KV-1S with BL-9 (equivalent)?<br />Yes, please, I'll take three. :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com