tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post3508726907744886890..comments2024-03-28T14:35:30.147-04:00Comments on Tank Archives: SurvivabilityPeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comBlogger21125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-90244704977545133862019-05-07T17:29:44.332-04:002019-05-07T17:29:44.332-04:00What this tells us is that T-38s in 1941 Eastern F...What this tells us is that T-38s in 1941 Eastern Front= Panther V in mid-1944 Western Front.<br />Steve Starhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13861115165278320860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-5202753224929575282018-09-21T07:36:14.137-04:002018-09-21T07:36:14.137-04:00john martin you need help man. You complain about ...john martin you need help man. You complain about bias and call Russians zionist commie murdering rapists. You get all your facts wrong, then say get educated while linking to borderline nazi propaganda. Tanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11993878272551825266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-16829161664972331452018-09-21T07:33:53.980-04:002018-09-21T07:33:53.980-04:00john martin man you need help. You complain about ...john martin man you need help. You complain about bias yet you call Russians zionist commie murdering rapists. You get nearly all your facts wrong, then link to borderline nazi propaganda and say get educated. Tanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11993878272551825266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-89057585927346292232018-04-12T11:29:54.843-04:002018-04-12T11:29:54.843-04:00And there there is the time frame, does the page a...And there there is the time frame, does the page autor site a time frame at all ?<br /><br />Does the Time frame exceed the time for the M4 in combat ? if so the M4 will see a lot more late war German Guns > 50 mm and very few of the older German guns < 75mm this may well account for the higher "safe hits" on the T34 but the nearly same failure due to "penetrations" Treyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04762515751812249420noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-25719861209399905522017-12-21T06:40:48.788-05:002017-12-21T06:40:48.788-05:00what "won the war" Germany never wantedb...what "won the war" Germany never wantedbut stalin did (there were over 5 million troops on the russian border with its ally Germany yet germany didnt have even 1 million troops on the border yet "russia did not want war" the reason germany lost was factless aggression and atrocity propaganda that fools still try to push today despite the non existence of proof of said atrocity or aggresion<br /><br /><br />get an education preferably not from a center for anti-fact ant-reality anti-german propaganda brainwashing <br /><br /><br /><br />the greatest story never told tgsnt.tvAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08387412700942230805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-13353372127150077112017-12-21T06:36:34.454-05:002017-12-21T06:36:34.454-05:00no its not buddy if you take german casualties of ...no its not buddy if you take german casualties of the eastern front and compare to russians then the ratio is more like 2 zionist commie murdereing rapists for every 1 germanAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08387412700942230805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-20281902231942856262015-06-23T13:38:08.090-04:002015-06-23T13:38:08.090-04:00I don't think there is a single gun that would...I don't think there is a single gun that would melt at maximum rate of fire, especially when you consider that tanks can sustain max ROF for a very short amount of time before their ready racks run dry. Also the Axis lost 12,483,000 in the East, it's quite a comparable number.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-24228435285165599012015-06-23T13:34:13.032-04:002015-06-23T13:34:13.032-04:00The link to the document the numbers came from is ...The link to the document the numbers came from is in the article.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-85464200493700400752015-06-23T10:15:59.311-04:002015-06-23T10:15:59.311-04:00The Nazis melted their gun barrels destroying T-34...The Nazis melted their gun barrels destroying T-34's. That was the only thing that saved the Sovs. They sent enough T-34 crews to their deaths to melt all the Nazi gun barrels, so that they could no longer defend themselves. That and the 14.5M Sov soldiers Stalin sent to their deaths were what kept the Sovs from losing that war .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-13525592086668272512015-06-23T10:09:32.465-04:002015-06-23T10:09:32.465-04:00He made them up. These numbers are pure fantasy. He made them up. These numbers are pure fantasy. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-47680018181804579052015-05-24T08:22:56.412-04:002015-05-24T08:22:56.412-04:00Hi! How exactly got your digits about T-34? (3,48 ...Hi! How exactly got your digits about T-34? (3,48 v/s 1.59)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-37663339024364652262015-05-22T03:39:25.070-04:002015-05-22T03:39:25.070-04:00Do you want to say that Matildas, Churchills. Crus...Do you want to say that Matildas, Churchills. Crusaders was also responsilble for that one shot kills?Crabteeth RMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09715071498952492184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-86061953722010521072015-05-21T15:23:11.879-04:002015-05-21T15:23:11.879-04:00Yes and....?
As I said there were late war US doc...Yes and....? <br />As I said there were late war US documents using very early war Pz IV's for armor comparisons (from tanks observed/captured from North Africa)... So the questions to what type of Panzer IV this is is relevant as assumptions can be wrong. <br /> <br /><br /> so what panzer IV type is it?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-84497249432690644842015-05-21T10:22:20.355-04:002015-05-21T10:22:20.355-04:00No, this is data collected in 1944.No, this is data collected in 1944.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-13869354129708803842015-05-21T09:24:25.441-04:002015-05-21T09:24:25.441-04:00How you calculated numbers for T-34? I think you s...How you calculated numbers for T-34? I think you should not use data for calibers less than 75/50 mm guns....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-3393343406115731302015-05-21T09:08:02.873-04:002015-05-21T09:08:02.873-04:00The Soviet report is from 1942 main german caliber...The Soviet report is from 1942 main german caliber is 50 mm(54%) with a good proportion(22%) of smaller calibers, the american report is from 1944 main german caliber is 75 mm(allied too) with a good proportion of 88 mm. Bigger calibers cause more damage due large mass that displace more armor from the target inside fighting compartment and at higher velocities due to bigger kinetic energy. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-30074806000179463162015-05-20T19:15:32.757-04:002015-05-20T19:15:32.757-04:00What "Panzer IV" type is being used here...What "Panzer IV" type is being used here?<br /> There was a US document used a very early (30mm frontal armor type) Panzer IV type for their armor comparisons with 1944 vehicles is that the case here?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-51474551904990718972015-05-19T11:55:46.821-04:002015-05-19T11:55:46.821-04:00Naturally the American study does not include vehi...Naturally the American study does not include vehicles from Balaton.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-34391045437806197542015-05-19T11:53:45.410-04:002015-05-19T11:53:45.410-04:00These are T-34-76es. When the ammo rack blows, the...These are T-34-76es. When the ammo rack blows, the turret doesn't necessarily fly away, here you can see only the LFP blown out: http://tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2013/10/up-armoured-t-34s.html not that it's much better for the crew.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-54083299870684717222015-05-19T06:00:23.762-04:002015-05-19T06:00:23.762-04:00Which T34s are compared ? Are there both versions ...Which T34s are compared ? Are there both versions ? Because there is very big difference between survivability of T34 and T34/85 when the turret is penetrated. While T34 lost turret when it is ammoracked, T34/85 lost just roof as I saw images of destroyed tanks in Korean war where americans fired on the tanks until its main ammunition was hit and I see many tanks without turret roof but their turrets were still normally seated to the hulls. I think this matter whether it can be repaired.Crabteeth RMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09715071498952492184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-54799452946160074312015-05-18T17:16:50.111-04:002015-05-18T17:16:50.111-04:00You know you just published an article
http://tank...You know you just published an article<br />http://tankarchives.blogspot.com/2015/05/tanks-at-balaton.html<br />that has pictures of Panthers with a whole lot more penetrations.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com